California State: Government-Grade Quality Assurance

Building compliant test automation for the Department of Conservation

California State government QA case study - compliance testing, regulated industries

Concluded:

See it live

The Challenge

Government projects move slowly for a reason. When you're building systems that monitor oil and gas operations across California, "move fast and break things" isn't just a bad idea - it's potentially dangerous and legally non-compliant.

Through OnCore Consulting, I led QA automation efforts for the California State Department of Conservation. The project involved building a web application for monitoring and auditing oil and gas manufacturers - a system that required extensive documentation, regulatory compliance, and bulletproof reliability.

What Made This Different

Government QA taught me a different rhythm than private sector work:

  • Extensive documentation - Every test case, every result, every change logged and traceable
  • Compliance requirements - Testing against regulatory standards, not just user stories
  • Slower but rigorous process - Quality over speed, with multi-level review gates
  • Stakeholder coordination - Working across multiple state agencies and contractors

What I Built

I architected, designed, and delivered CI/CD-integrated test automation solutions using Java, Selenium, Maven, TestNG, and Azure DevOps. The focus was on reliability and traceability rather than just speed.

  • End-to-end test automation for the oil and gas monitoring web application
  • REST API test development using Java and RestAssured
  • CI/CD pipeline integration for automated regression testing
  • Comprehensive test documentation meeting government audit requirements
  • Locator naming conventions and reporting standards for long-term maintainability

Impact & Results

  • 30% reduction in release cycle time across 4 cross-functional teams
  • 22% improvement in test pass rate through better tooling and practices
  • 40% fewer escaped defects through comprehensive requirements analysis
  • 25% faster test development through standardized conventions
  • Promoted to Software Engineer in Test within 6 months for leadership contributions

Key Takeaway

Government work taught me that speed and quality aren't always trade-offs. When you invest in proper documentation, naming conventions, and process rigor, you actually move faster in the long run - because you spend less time debugging and more time delivering.

The skills I developed here - working with regulated industries, maintaining audit trails, and building for compliance - translate directly to healthcare, finance, and any sector where reliability isn't optional.

Duration: April 2019 – August 2020
Location: Greater Sacramento Area
Role: Software Engineer in Test (promoted from QA Automation Engineer)
Client: California State Department of Conservation